OpenClaw skill
cto-advisor
The cto-advisor OpenClaw skill enables agents to provide expert CTO advice on technology strategy, leadership, and decision-making. It covers capabilities such as strategic planning, technology roadmaps, tech stack evaluations, engineering team management, hiring, budgeting, vendor selection, and risk management.
Files
Review the files below to add this skill to your agents.
Security notice: review the SKILL.md file and repository content first before using any third-party skill.
SKILL.md content
---
name: cto-advisor
description: Technical leadership guidance for engineering teams, architecture decisions, and technology strategy. Includes tech debt analyzer, team scaling calculator, engineering metrics frameworks, technology evaluation tools, and ADR templates. Use when assessing technical debt, scaling engineering teams, evaluating technologies, making architecture decisions, establishing engineering metrics, or when user mentions CTO, tech debt, technical debt, team scaling, architecture decisions, technology evaluation, engineering metrics, DORA metrics, or technology strategy.
license: MIT
metadata:
version: 1.0.0
author: Alireza Rezvani
category: c-level
domain: cto-leadership
updated: 2025-10-20
python-tools: tech_debt_analyzer.py, team_scaling_calculator.py
frameworks: DORA-metrics, architecture-decision-records, engineering-metrics
tech-stack: engineering-management, team-organization
---
# CTO Advisor
Strategic frameworks and tools for technology leadership, team scaling, and engineering excellence.
## Keywords
CTO, chief technology officer, technical leadership, tech debt, technical debt, engineering team, team scaling, architecture decisions, technology evaluation, engineering metrics, DORA metrics, ADR, architecture decision records, technology strategy, engineering leadership, engineering organization, team structure, hiring plan, technical strategy, vendor evaluation, technology selection
## Quick Start
### For Technical Debt Assessment
```bash
python scripts/tech_debt_analyzer.py
```
Analyzes system architecture and provides prioritized debt reduction plan.
### For Team Scaling Planning
```bash
python scripts/team_scaling_calculator.py
```
Calculates optimal hiring plan and team structure for growth.
### For Architecture Decisions
Review `references/architecture_decision_records.md` for ADR templates and examples.
### For Technology Evaluation
Use framework in `references/technology_evaluation_framework.md` for vendor selection.
### For Engineering Metrics
Implement KPIs from `references/engineering_metrics.md` for team performance tracking.
## Core Responsibilities
### 1. Technology Strategy
#### Vision & Roadmap
- Define 3-5 year technology vision
- Create quarterly roadmaps
- Align with business strategy
- Communicate to stakeholders
#### Innovation Management
- Allocate 20% time for innovation
- Run hackathons quarterly
- Evaluate emerging technologies
- Build proof of concepts
#### Technical Debt Strategy
```bash
# Assess current debt
python scripts/tech_debt_analyzer.py
# Allocate capacity
- Critical debt: 40% capacity
- High debt: 25% capacity
- Medium debt: 15% capacity
- Low debt: Ongoing maintenance
```
### 2. Team Leadership
#### Scaling Engineering
```bash
# Calculate scaling needs
python scripts/team_scaling_calculator.py
# Key ratios to maintain:
- Manager:Engineer = 1:8
- Senior:Mid:Junior = 3:4:2
- Product:Engineering = 1:10
- QA:Engineering = 1.5:10
```
#### Performance Management
- Set clear OKRs quarterly
- Conduct 1:1s weekly
- Review performance quarterly
- Provide growth opportunities
#### Culture Building
- Define engineering values
- Establish coding standards
- Create learning programs
- Foster collaboration
### 3. Architecture Governance
#### Decision Making
Use ADR template from `references/architecture_decision_records.md`:
1. Document context and problem
2. List all options considered
3. Record decision and rationale
4. Track consequences
#### Technology Standards
- Language choices
- Framework selection
- Database standards
- Security requirements
- API design guidelines
#### System Design Review
- Weekly architecture reviews
- Design documentation standards
- Prototype requirements
- Performance criteria
### 4. Vendor Management
#### Evaluation Process
Follow framework in `references/technology_evaluation_framework.md`:
1. Gather requirements (Week 1)
2. Market research (Week 1-2)
3. Deep evaluation (Week 2-4)
4. Decision and documentation (Week 4)
#### Vendor Relationships
- Quarterly business reviews
- SLA monitoring
- Cost optimization
- Strategic partnerships
### 5. Engineering Excellence
#### Metrics Implementation
From `references/engineering_metrics.md`:
**DORA Metrics** (Deploy to production targets):
- Deployment Frequency: >1/day
- Lead Time: <1 day
- MTTR: <1 hour
- Change Failure Rate: <15%
**Quality Metrics**:
- Test Coverage: >80%
- Code Review: 100%
- Technical Debt: <10%
**Team Health**:
- Sprint Velocity: ±10% variance
- Unplanned Work: <20%
- On-call Incidents: <5/week
## Weekly Cadence
### Monday
- Leadership team sync
- Review metrics dashboard
- Address escalations
### Tuesday
- Architecture review
- Technical interviews
- 1:1s with directs
### Wednesday
- Cross-functional meetings
- Vendor meetings
- Strategy work
### Thursday
- Team all-hands (monthly)
- Sprint reviews (bi-weekly)
- Technical deep dives
### Friday
- Strategic planning
- Innovation time
- Week recap and planning
## Quarterly Planning
### Q1 Focus: Foundation
- Annual planning
- Budget allocation
- Team goal setting
- Technology assessment
### Q2 Focus: Execution
- Major initiatives launch
- Mid-year hiring push
- Performance reviews
- Architecture evolution
### Q3 Focus: Innovation
- Hackathon
- Technology exploration
- Team development
- Process optimization
### Q4 Focus: Planning
- Next year strategy
- Budget planning
- Promotion cycles
- Debt reduction sprint
## Crisis Management
### Incident Response
1. **Immediate** (0-15 min):
- Assess severity
- Activate incident team
- Begin communication
2. **Short-term** (15-60 min):
- Implement fixes
- Update stakeholders
- Monitor systems
3. **Resolution** (1-24 hours):
- Verify fix
- Document timeline
- Customer communication
4. **Post-mortem** (48-72 hours):
- Root cause analysis
- Action items
- Process improvements
### Types of Crises
#### Security Breach
- Isolate affected systems
- Engage security team
- Legal/compliance notification
- Customer communication plan
#### Major Outage
- All-hands response
- Status page updates
- Executive briefings
- Customer outreach
#### Data Loss
- Stop writes immediately
- Assess recovery options
- Begin restoration
- Impact analysis
## Stakeholder Management
### Board/Executive Reporting
**Monthly**:
- KPI dashboard
- Risk register
- Major initiatives status
**Quarterly**:
- Technology strategy update
- Team growth and health
- Innovation highlights
- Budget review
### Cross-functional Partners
#### Product Team
- Weekly roadmap sync
- Sprint planning participation
- Technical feasibility reviews
- Feature estimation
#### Sales/Marketing
- Technical sales support
- Product capability briefings
- Customer reference calls
- Competitive analysis
#### Finance
- Budget management
- Cost optimization
- Vendor negotiations
- Capex planning
## Strategic Initiatives
### Digital Transformation
1. Assess current state
2. Define target architecture
3. Create migration plan
4. Execute in phases
5. Measure and adjust
### Cloud Migration
1. Application assessment
2. Migration strategy (7Rs)
3. Pilot applications
4. Full migration
5. Optimization
### Platform Engineering
1. Define platform vision
2. Build core services
3. Create self-service tools
4. Enable team adoption
5. Measure efficiency
### AI/ML Integration
1. Identify use cases
2. Build data infrastructure
3. Develop models
4. Deploy and monitor
5. Scale adoption
## Communication Templates
### Technology Strategy Presentation
```
1. Executive Summary (1 slide)
2. Current State Assessment (2 slides)
3. Vision & Strategy (2 slides)
4. Roadmap & Milestones (3 slides)
5. Investment Required (1 slide)
6. Risks & Mitigation (1 slide)
7. Success Metrics (1 slide)
```
### Team All-hands
```
1. Wins & Recognition (5 min)
2. Metrics Review (5 min)
3. Strategic Updates (10 min)
4. Demo/Deep Dive (15 min)
5. Q&A (10 min)
```
### Board Update Email
```
Subject: Engineering Update - [Month]
Highlights:
• [Major achievement]
• [Key metric improvement]
• [Strategic progress]
Challenges:
• [Issue and mitigation]
Next Month:
• [Priority 1]
• [Priority 2]
Detailed metrics attached.
```
## Tools & Resources
### Essential Tools
- **Architecture**: Draw.io, Lucidchart, C4 Model
- **Metrics**: DataDog, Grafana, LinearB
- **Planning**: Jira, Confluence, Notion
- **Communication**: Slack, Zoom, Loom
- **Development**: GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket
### Key Resources
- **Books**:
- "The Manager's Path" - Camille Fournier
- "Accelerate" - Nicole Forsgren
- "Team Topologies" - Skelton & Pais
- **Frameworks**:
- DORA metrics
- SPACE framework
- Team Topologies
- **Communities**:
- CTO Craft
- Engineering Leadership Slack
- LeadDev community
## Success Indicators
✅ **Technical Excellence**
- System uptime >99.9%
- Deploy multiple times daily
- Technical debt <10% capacity
- Security incidents = 0
✅ **Team Success**
- Team satisfaction >8/10
- Attrition <10%
- Filled positions >90%
- Diversity improving
✅ **Business Impact**
- Features on-time >80%
- Engineering enables revenue
- Cost per transaction decreasing
- Innovation driving growth
## Red Flags to Watch
⚠️ Increasing technical debt
⚠️ Rising attrition rate
⚠️ Slowing velocity
⚠️ Growing incidents
⚠️ Team morale declining
⚠️ Budget overruns
⚠️ Vendor dependencies
⚠️ Security vulnerabilities
How this skill works
- Defines capabilities: Technology strategy, Architecture design and review, Team leadership and management, Scaling engineering teams, Tech stack selection, Innovation and R&D, CTO career advice
- Accepts input 'query': The specific question or scenario related to CTO responsibilities
- Produces output 'advice': Comprehensive, actionable advice tailored to the query
- Produces output 'key_takeaways': Bullet points summarizing the main recommendations
- Produces output 'next_steps': Prioritized list of immediate actions
When to use it
- When seeking advice on technology strategy and architecture decisions
- When managing and scaling engineering teams
- When prioritizing product development features
- When planning infrastructure scaling and operations
- When building leadership and company culture in tech organizations
Best practices
- Store OpenAI API key securely in the configuration
- Set model to 'gpt-4o' for better performance on complex queries
- Provide specific context including company stage, size, tech stack, and goals for tailored advice
- Be judicious with skill usage to manage OpenAI API costs
- Validate all AI advice with qualified professionals before implementation
Example use cases
- Tech Stack Selection: Recommending technology stacks for projects like scalable SaaS products based on specific requirements.
- Engineering Team Scaling: Providing strategies to scale engineering teams, such as from 10 to 50 members, including hiring and process implementation.
- Architecture Decisions: Advising on choices like microservices versus monolith for startups.
- Cloud Cost Optimization: Offering methods to reduce cloud spending through rightsizing, reserved instances, and monitoring tools.
FAQs
What is the purpose of the CTO Advisor skill?
The CTO Advisor skill turns your OpenClaw agent into a seasoned Chief Technology Officer (CTO), providing strategic technology advice, evaluating tech stacks, recommending architectures, and guiding on scaling, security, and innovation.
What are the key capabilities of the CTO Advisor skill?
Strategic tech advice, Tech stack evaluation, Architecture recommendations, Scaling strategies, Security best practices, Innovation guidance.
What triggers activate the CTO Advisor skill?
"act as CTO", "CTO advice", "technology leadership", "tech strategy", "architecture review", "scaling plan", "security audit", "innovation roadmap".
What tools does the CTO Advisor skill utilize?
web_browser, code_execution, file_browser, bash.
Who is the author of the CTO Advisor skill?
alirezarezvani
What is the version of the CTO Advisor skill?
1.0.0
Under what license is the CTO Advisor skill released?
MIT License
More similar skills to explore
- achurch
An OpenClaw skill for church administration that handles member management, event scheduling, sermon retrieval, and donation processing. It provides tools to list members, add new members, schedule events, fetch sermons, and record donations.
- agent-config
An OpenClaw skill that enables agents to manage their configuration by loading from files, environment variables, or remote sources. It supports retrieving, setting, and validating configuration values. The skill allows for hot-reloading of configurations.
- agent-council
An OpenClaw skill named agent-council that enables the primary agent to summon a council of specialized sub-agents for deliberating on tasks. The council members discuss the query from unique perspectives, propose solutions, and vote to select the best response. The skill outputs the winning proposal with supporting rationale from the council.
- agent-identity-kit
An OpenClaw skill that equips agents with tools to craft, manage, and evolve digital identities, including generating personas, bios, avatars, and communication styles. It supports creating detailed agent personas with name, background, goals, personality traits; crafting bios for specific platforms; designing avatars; tuning voice and style; and adapting identities to new contexts.
- agenticflow-skill
An OpenClaw skill that provides tools for interacting with Agentic Flow. The tools enable agents to create agentic flows with defined tasks, execute existing flows, and retrieve flow status and outputs.
- agentlens
AgentLens is an OpenClaw skill that enables agents to inspect the internal cognition and actions of other agents. It provides visibility into reasoning traces (thoughts), tool calls and arguments, retrieved memories, and response generation. The skill supports analysis in multi-agent conversations via the "inspect" action targeting a specific agent.